CHRISTOPHER CABRAL and CHERYL CABRAL v. SETH FRAIN, COLLEEN FRAIN, STEVEN PALM and KERRY PALM.

For the reasons set forth in the court’s Decision of this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 1) the Cabrals have a 20’wide utility easement across the Frain/Palm parcels in the location shown on Exhibit 1 to the Decision, but do not have a general right to pass and repass across that easement to their lot; 2) the fences within the easement area may remain, but may be removed by the Cabrals whenever needed for utility installation, maintenance, or repair, and 3) the boulders and trees shown on Exhibit 2 must be removed at the defendants’ expense as soon as practicable.

SO ORDERED.