Home RAYMOND J. STEVENS, III v. HANDY DEVELOPERS, INC. and THOMAS MITCHELL.

MISC 12-471263

January 19, 2016

Hampden, ss.

CUTLER, C. J.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Summary Judgment Decision issued this date, it is hereby:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that, through operation of the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, the August 17, 2006 deed from Daniel Lorenz (“Daniel”) to Handy Developers, Inc. (“Handy Developers”), conveying all of Daniel’s “Right, Title and Interest” in 36 Falvey Street, West Springfield, Massachusetts (“Locus”) (the “2006 Handy Developers Deed”), [Note 1] actually conveyed Daniel’s interest in Locus to Thomas Mitchell (“Mitchell”), individually;

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that, through the operation of the doctrine of estoppel by deed, Mitchell is estopped from asserting the interest in Locus acquired from Daniel through the 2006 Handy Developers Deed against Raymond J. Stevens (“Stevens”), the successor in interest to Aames Funding Corp.;

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that Stevens’ title held under the May 4, 2009 deed from Mary A. Murray to Stevens [Note 2] includes the interest in Locus conveyed by Daniel in the 2006 Handy Developers Deed; and

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that Stevens holds title to Locus free of any claims by Mitchell and/or Handy Developers.

It is further ORDERED that upon the payment of the appropriate recording fees, an attested copy of this judgment may be filed with the Hampden County Registry of Deeds and marginally referenced as appropriate.

By the Court


FOOTNOTES

[Note 1] Recorded with the Hampden County Registry of Deeds on October 18, 2006 at 16263, Page 494.

[Note 2] Recorded with the Hampden County Registry of Deeds on May 8, 2009 at Book 17780, Page 488.