SANDS, J.
For the reasons set forth in the Decision dated July 8, 2016 (on Plaintiffs motion filed on November 20, 2016, which seeks clarification or to correct clerical mistake[s] in the Decision and Judgment (the Motion for Clarification)), based upon this courts review of the Decision dated February 24, 1989 (Sullivan, C.J.) and the courts intent expressed therein, it is hereby:
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Paragraph 2 of the Judgment dated February 24, 1989 (the Judgment) [Note 1] is hereby vacated and replaced with the following provision: the Unpaved Segment of Whitney Road, defined in the Decision of even date hereof as the portion of Whitney Road located westerly of the Paved Segment of Whitney Road (defined in the Decision of even date hereof as the 0.63 mile segment of said road running westerly from its intersection with Erickson Road) is not a public way, but it is a private way which the Brodmerkles, as appurtenant to their land, have a right to use for all purposes including the installation of utilities; and,
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Brodmerkles have, as appurtenant to their land, a right to use the entire length of Whitney Road as a right of way for all purposes including the installation of utilities; and,
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Paragraph 3 of the Judgment (pertaining to the Towns counterclaim, no longer at issue in this case) remains in full force and effect, unchanged by this Corrected Judgment.
SO ORDERED.
FOOTNOTES
[Note 1] To wit, the first ADJUDGED and ORDERED paragraph, which had read as follows: ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the portion of Whitney Road adjacent to land of the [Brodmerkles] shown as Lot 1 on [the ANR Plan] is not a public way, but it is a private way which the [Brodmerkles], as appurtenant to their land, have a right to use for all purposes including the installation of utilities.