Home ADRIAN BIGNAMI and PETRA BIGNAMI v. MIGUEL SERRANO and MARISA SERRANO

MISC 18-000323

May 7, 2020

Norfolk, ss.

LONG, J.

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in the court's Decision of this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: (1) the Bignamis have no right to park on the Serrano property or in any new garage the Serranos may construct, (2) the Bignamis have no right to drive onto the Serrano property for any purpose, (3) the Serranos continue to have an express easement to use the shared driveway to access their property, both for pedestrians and vehicles, (4) except for the school van that picks up the Bignamis' disabled child, no vehicle may pause or stop anywhere on the shared driveway for any purpose at any time, no matter how brief the pause or stop might be, (5) the Bignamis may install and maintain the speed calming measures described in the Decision on the shared driveway, (6) the Bignamis may install and maintain a fence between the properties, and also a fence, cinder blocks, or other barriers along the edges of the shared driveway so long as they are clearly marked (including with snow stakes in the winter) and do not encroach onto the shared driveway, (7) audio and video surveillance of the shared driveway is prohibited and permanently enjoined, (8) the Bignamis may relocate the shared driveway and construct a connector on the Serrano property in the manner and in the location described in the Decision so long as they do so properly, with adequate drainage control, and pay all costs associated with the relocation and connector, and (9) the 40-foot right of way easement over the Bignami lot for the benefit of the Serrano lot no longer exists for any purpose.